Existing Users: Because of an update to the forum software you will need to reset your password. Please use the "Forgot?" link on the sign in form to do so. If that doesn't work, send me an email at feedback@forzaminardi.com and I'll sort you out!

Today's GPWC meeting

From Grandprix.com:
The F1 manufacturers make a statement

The five manufacturers involved in Formula 1, other than Ferrari, have issued a statement about today's meeting of the Formula 1 teams at Cliveden in England. The document was issued by BMW, DaimlerChrysler, Honda, Renault and Toyota. The statement said that the five major manufacturers and nine teams reached the following understanding.

They unanimously agreed upon the establishment of a new framework for their participation in Grand Prix motor racing post 2007. They confirmed and fully endorsed technical rules and regulations and the "Governing Principles for Grand Prix Motor Racing" previously developed by the major manufacturers. They confirmed their support of the principles of premier Grand Prix motor racing post 2007 as described by International Sport and Entertainment today. They agreed that when the series is established they will guarantee from 2006 the supply of competitive engines at an affordable price to a second team which commits to such series. They agree to continue to co-operate together and to establish technical, sporting and governance working groups with appropriate specialists, operating within a defined timetable and brief to document in full a new structure and regulations for the sport so as to put the teams in a position to participate in a timely and orderly manner in 2008. They also agreed that all teams be invited to join on equal terms.

Sauber, Red Bull and Jordan "warmly welcome" the above and agree to respond formally with their positions on the document, following further internal consultation.
So, the independants back the manufacturers............... exeptMinardi !!?!?!?!:o

Has Bernie bought Stoddart ???

Comments

  • PS wouldn't do anything to damage his precious relationship with FIA
    so maybe that's why it's not there:cool:
    From the articel

    "The statement said that the five major manufacturers and nine teams reached the following understanding."
    It would indicate that Minardi is on board too, maybe
    there are just a few lines missing:

    Paul Stoddard from Minardi was unavailable for comments
    as he was on a long phone conversation with FIA saying:

    "Let me quote it again in case you missed it the first few hundred
    times:
    - All parties further agree that all Teams are invited to join on equal terms.
    - the supply of competitive engines at an affordable price "
  • I think we should tread carefully where the GPWC is concerned.
    It is run by Car manufacturers and they only have two things in mind, making money and themselves.
    Are they really going to be concerned about small independent teams who will just make up the numbers in this new series?
  • I agree weatherman. I say this forecast if fine at first with the possiblity of showers ahead. And I don't mean the money kind.
  • I think GPWC will be much better for the teams itself then FIA
    (but whatever i think hardly matters to anyone :cool:

    Why:
    Well first there is the issue of the money. Now all profits go to Bernie and
    a very small part is fed back to the teams. Bernie is out to make money
    for him and the three banks.

    GPWC is run by the Car manufacturers who's core business is making cars
    They race for publicity and spend a lot of resources on getting publicity.
    So there is a good chance that there will be bigger parts of the profits for the
    teams.

    Also they commited to providing engines for an affordable price to a second
    team, so that could be a good thing too as this might enable the independents
    to close the gap a bit to the big teams and get a nice new exciting race class

    Now FIA could all have arranged this as well, but so far they haven't done
    so, all they seem to be doing is introducing last minute chances that costs even
    more money and they seemed to be a bit bias for TOIT.
    If a new organization is needed to get things done that the old one doesn't
    want to, then sadly, that might be the way to go.

    As a wise old men once said.
    Don't keep trying to run through a brick wall if you can walk around it.
  • From http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=32084

    STODDART IMPRESSED BY GPWC
    Last Updated: Thursday, 17, February, 2005, 11:21

    Paul Stoddart believes that the GPWC have “raised the stakes” in the battle for the future of F1.

    Stoddart and eight of his fellow team bosses met officials from the rival championship in Slough on Wednesday.

    The GPWC put on a presentation which Stoddart described as “incredibly professional and well thought through, put together by a well-funded, ready-to-go organisation".

    He went on: "We are at the early stages of what is going to be a long, drawn-out battle for the future of Formula 1. I am hopeful for a peaceful solution.

    “But if the package put to the nine teams yesterday proves deliverable, and it is very attractive indeed, that would be sufficient to make most people sign up to it."

    Under the terms of the new series, teams would receive a larger proportion of the sport’s revenues, and the money would be divided more equally.

    However, Stoddart said: "Money is not the prime mover for a lot of those who sat around the table yesterday. Corporate governance is of far greater importance.

    "The pledge to treat all teams equally and to ensure transparency and proper sporting and technical regulation was critically important. The meeting left no one in any doubt that the stakes have gone up."


  • met officials from the rival championship in Slough on Wednesday.
    I thought it was in Cleveden, but Slough? What a bad taste...
  • I thought it was in Cleveden, but Slough? What a bad taste...
    Obviously you have'nt seen 'The Office' :D
  • Oh, I can see it now.

    Bernie, trudging disconsolately down pit lane as the song leads in..........'so what becomes of you my love? when they have finally stripped you of......the handbags and the glad rags that the racers had to sweat so you could buy.

    Make it so No. 1
  • TOIT is supposed to have a VETO right in the future concorde according to F1racing.net:
    Sauber have joined six fellow Formula One teams in signing a new 'memorandum of understanding' with the carmaker group. Last week, they all met in London, where only the Swiss camp, Red Bull and Midland-owned Jordan held off signing up, pending 'internal consultation.'

    Britain's The Times newspaper also hinted that, Sauber signed, the other pair 'are likely to follow.'

    But just how did GPWC convince the 'group of nine' to side so robustly against Ferrari and Bernie Ecclestone? They might not have needed to.

    The Times revealed that Ferrari's new Concorde deal included, to the other teams' chagrin, the 'right of veto' in any mooted regulation change.
  • ^ You have got to be kdding me :rolleyes:
  • Clevedon as in by the sea? North Somerset?

    slough hehe what a place almost as nice as croydon:hehe: mind you, loads of important companies in both places
  • The Times revealed that Ferrari's new Concorde deal included, to the other teams' chagrin, the 'right of veto' in any mooted regulation change.
    If this is true, then the new Concorde is a joke.
  • Just like the UN really, 'cept the security council only has one member.
Sign In or Register to comment.