Existing Users: Because of an update to the forum software you will need to reset your password. Please use the "Forgot?" link on the sign in form to do so. If that doesn't work, send me an email at feedback@forzaminardi.com and I'll sort you out!
Two nations you'd like to see go at each other.
No U.N. interference.
No alliances interfearing.
No nuclear attacks.
No terrorism.
Straight nation on nation action. Wait, wouldn't that make it homo? Eh, never mind.
So, two nations you'd like to see go all out in war? For laughs? For revenge? For that sick little man in your shoulder going "Kill them! Kill them all! MWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!11"
I'll start it off:
Australia vs New Zealand. Would be closer than you think except the fact that the Kiwis have a few Hercules transports and the odd old Huey masquerading as an airforce. :hehe:
Germany vs France. Germany deserves to grind those damn people in the ground without interference for once.
Comments
Iraq vs. Kuwait: imagine what a laugh if, after the coalition leaves, the new democratically elected Iraqi govt. reinvades Kuwait....
China vs. Usa: who knows if it will not really happen at some point!
Germany v France; damn right, we've bailed them out twice too often. Look at the thanks we get.
While we're at it:
Belgium v Holland. Smug fockers.
Iran v Iraq. Good old days.
SAfrica v Zimbabwe. Please.
Serbia v The Neighbours. Has this been done?
[Edited on 5/4/2005 by viges]
New Zealand South Island v New Zealand North Island :hehe:
Think about it. China would get decimated on the water and the US would get decimated on land. The Chinese can throw 10 guys at each and every US soldier, whilst the Chinese ships would be sunk before they even got to Taiwan.
Think about it. China would get decimated on the water and the US would get decimated on land. The Chinese can throw 10 guys at each and every US soldier, whilst the Chinese ships would be sunk before they even got to Taiwan. [/quote]Ok then.
French Canada v English Canada :hehe:
IMPERIALISTS!!!!!:spank::spank::spank::spank::spank:
:D
Bring it on Clown :cool:
Its all yours :P
As far as China vs US - it really only is a matter of time.
How would one side beat the other without resorting to the Bomb? You couldn't invade China and win, and they probably couldn't invade the US and win.
Hell, as I noted above, they couldn't even get 20 miles from their coast without having their fleet sunk if the US got serious and deployed 2 or 3 carrier groups.
[Edited on 5/4/2005 by MinardiP1]
As fara as actual combat it prob would be over Taiwan - possibly Korea. Not really sure.
However, the Chinamen are going hammer and tong on building up a strong navy. Over time the sheer numbers of ships they deploy will be difficult to track let alone handle.
What about my suggestion to let the U.N. play - just for the comic relief?
Are the Chinese building carriers quig? btw,m what do you guys do with your old carriers like the Kitty Hawk when they get retired? The Brits sell theirs, but i've never seen the US do that.
As far as I know the U.S. either makes them into museums or use them for target practice, which they then turn into a coral reef.
I think that Koffi would say all that diplomatic crap BUT if he were to send some troops in they could act as the Keystone Cops.
What was the latest one - Jordainian troops in Timor are having external genitalia issues - higher than the norm. Reason - they are getting it on with goats. No shit.
Now I don't want any crap about the source - it is not some right wing wacko rag in this country - as a matter of fact it is from yours.
This is what I mean by UN providing comic relief to two nations beating the crap out of each other in our maock war.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,12655192%5E2703,00.html
Quig has probably a better grip ont his than I, but I would suggest without resorting to the bomb, the Yanks would win it with Airpower.
Lease would probably be the best to advise on this.